roxy: (rose ))
roxy ([personal profile] roxy) wrote2017-03-27 09:21 pm
Entry tags:

Now, *that's* more like it!



elliot!

Elliot and I approve! That's a name a child can wear proudly, without a lot of explaining 'bout how mom and dad smoked up and drew random words out of a hat. That's the Padaleckis, though, great taste in all things!

[identity profile] dawnybee.livejournal.com 2017-03-28 04:42 am (UTC)(link)
Odette Eliot can go to Disneyland and find a license plate souvenir with her name unlike :ahem: other children...

[identity profile] rockstarpeach.livejournal.com 2017-03-28 05:11 am (UTC)(link)
I rarely know what you're talking about. Your non-sensical ramblings still make me smile :)

[identity profile] supernutjapan.livejournal.com 2017-03-28 07:46 am (UTC)(link)
Beautiful name ❤❤❤
fanspired: (soulmates)

[personal profile] fanspired 2017-03-28 09:53 am (UTC)(link)
A friend and I have discussed the idiosyncratic choices Jensen has made for his children's names and concluded they're fake. They seem altogether too ostentatious and out of character with Jensen's fundamentally private nature, so the theory is that the kids are actually called different names by friends and family. This is to protect their privacy and to protect them from being approached by strangers who don't know their real names. I suspect this may be standard practice among many celebrity families, and would explain a lot of the weirdo kids names out there.

[identity profile] gingersnap1224.livejournal.com 2017-03-28 03:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Am I the only one who finds the Pop and Suki thing a little weird? It's great that they are raising money for 2 great charities, but couldn't they have just asked people to donate instead of sending baby gifts. The way they are doing it is making Pop and Suki money and probably getting Genevieve a life time supply of tiny pink purses. It just seems like they are using the birth of their beautiful baby for profit. Is it just me? Am I taking this the wrong way?

I do like the name though.